while having the idea of creating a dictionary of body exressions and their different qualities, I started reading researches about positions and motion in dance.
extracts by the book choreographic encounters, published by the institute of choreography and dance (2003), ireland
a conversation on stillness
Andre lepecki: “stillness as an accusation of certain choreographic choices being a kind of anti-dance… what is provoked in the spectator when they see a dancer not dancing. Why the imperative for the danser to be moving all the time?”
Further he compares the ‘silence’ piece of John Cage to the performances where stillness is used as part of the work. He sees a relation between silence and stillness and he points that as the ‘non-playing’ piano of Cage opens up the audience perception to take in everything that otherwise would seem as noise. likewise stillness forces to intensify our attention of the little events -tremors, small movements- .
He questions if stillness is being totally stil or not moving? for him stillness allows the creation of intimacy and contributes to our vision to become less scopic and get as away from dance as image only cause we start to invest in the other senses -listening-.
myriam van imschoot: “one is that in moving into stillness a shape materialises… a containement of energy within shape” she referes S.Paxton who was describing stillness as paragraphing; “sth that delinates the structure of the dance… that little bit of space after a paragraph makes the paragraph become a paragraph and gives the shape to what preceded it…” she also mentions the modernist approach of dance where the dancer should not be too much on the foreground otherwise he destroys the dance. this is also the soil where the ‘pure dance’ was grounded in movement while stillness as its repression.
ric allsopp: he talks abou D.Gordon uses techniques to expand time by using filmic images that are both still and moving, through slow motion or repetition and looping…”stillness is that bit where you come from somewhere in the process of going somewher else”
isabell ginot: she quotes Dominique Bagouet who was saying ‘I don’t want dancers, I want women and men who dance ‘. He uded many techniques to investigate stillness. it could be a detailed microscopic choreography or as moments where the presence of the person would be shown as opposed to the form of the dance moving
extracts from the dictionary of V.P.Dunlop ‘dance words’ (1995)
pure dance:
“is a dance without a support-no music, no narrative, just the dance”, louis horst, 1958
“it intigrates force, time and spacepatterns into a meaningfull whole. This whole is the abstract form of the dance “, barbara mettler, 1980
absolute dance:
“a wigman term for a dance genre free from subservience to music and theatricality, a dance that would take its impulse from the primordial sources of the body and space”, walter sorell, 1975
movement based work:
“kinetic work, not necessarily regarded as dance, which arises out of movement exploration rather than as a response to sound or to the embodiment of a narrative , Rosemary Butcher, interview”
movement:
“one of man’s languages “, rudolf laban, 1966
pedestrial movement:
“a source of movement for choreographers, generated from the everyday behaviour and functional motion of ordinary people going aout their business”, eds
shadow movements:
“tiny muscular movements such as the raising of the brow, the jerrking of the hand, the tapping of the foot which have none other than expressive value”, rudolf laban, 1971